People who make the logical assumption can say "I will overcome life... [at death]". (The [] have my words, so...thats what I thought...)

Ive said this before, poems about death are not the best because the writers do not KNOW death.

Short and sweet.. I was rivited for the half second it took to read.

The only thing I know for sure about death is that anytime is too soon (for me at least, I think I would be capable of sending a few people to an early grave...).

Hope you have better luck with the poem then my short story did.. *sigh* Nobody likes a good fantasy snippet these days..

It's not about death actually.
The poem goes about the troubles Life throws at you, those that will come and those you have already seen.
The poem is intended to learn you that you should not fear the future and learn from the past.

I have always thougt that Death is the beginning of something new or the beginning of nothing. But I never saw it as a part of life cause life is living, not dying. Dying is death.

Not bad, PR. Stick the definite article before Future and Past to make it correct grammar (or 'my' future if you prefer). Taught is spelled incorrectly.

Right, but "I will overcome life" is what threw me. Life should be a blessing, not a burden, and it seemed that by overcoming life you would enter death.

In fact, it all seems to scream a void past life. But, the artist is the best to ask. Thats just MY interpritation.

Well I understand you and it is you right to have your interpretation.

But with 'I will come Life' I ment that I wont break, that I wont be beaten by any trouble life throws at me