Slaiv
Feb 9 2004, 12:19 AM
Since the exact time that the MEMod will take place in is not known by us mere peasants, I have no idea if the Nazgul will be in it....
My question is:
Will they?
ot>The ROTK game by EA is based off the movie, right? Then how come Sauron's lieutenant is in the game, but not in the movie? Extended version, here we come!
valdir
Feb 9 2004, 03:53 AM
Nice job answering your own question

(ROTK game + EEdition)
Nazgul-
Well the encyclopedia of Arda says this...
| QUOTE |
| First seen in c. II 2250; went 'into the shadows' II 3441; reappeared in Middle-earth c. III 1300; finally destroyed in III 3019 |
So assuming the mod takes place in the first 2/5 of the third Age, then no. Then again, assuming is bad....
-val
Ancalagon
Feb 9 2004, 05:54 AM
Well, we still don't know the timeline in which the Mod take place. For all we know, it could be during the Wars in the North with the Witch-King of Angmar (The leader of the Ulari (Ringwraiths)). Since that took place after Isildur's death and before Bilbo was born, and the fact that little is written concerning the troubles of the Northern Kingdom (IIRC) then that would be a prime place for this Mod.
Also, it was stated in the beginning of LotR that in the days when the King ruled up in Fornost, the habitants of the Shire (hobbits) did in fact send a few of their people to aid the Northern Realm in the Wars against Angmar. Also, the Shire was orignally Farmland for the Kingdom of the North as well.
Point being, the Nazgul may yet come into this Mod, so do not assume that something will not be in this Mod until the Devs actually say that it won't be in the Mod...
Slaiv
Feb 9 2004, 08:13 PM
Excellent......
Since we can't kill them [it would mess up the timeline], I will become a professional Ulari Stalker.....a.k.a. I will stalk the wraiths......... MWAHAHAHAH!
Assuming they're in. BUt once again, assuming IS bad.
Polyphemos
Feb 12 2004, 08:41 PM
How about giants then? As far as I know they are only mentioned in the Hobbit. I haven’t been able to find any references to them elsewhere in Tolkiens work, and perhaps the giants who where throwing rocks in the Misty Mountains was in fact Ents and didn’t exist as an own race. They are certainly a very mysterious part of Middle-Earth; where did they come from, what did they look like? Considering so little is known about this race will they at all figure in MeMod?
Perhaps someone knows of other parts of Tolkiens writing in which they are mentioned?
the_subliminator!
Feb 13 2004, 11:42 PM
I always kind of pictured the giants in The Hobbit to be cave trolls and the like. Since the book was written before the LOTR trilogy was even planned (I could be wrong about that, but it seems I'd read it somewhere), Tolkien took a little more of a high fantasy feel to the whole story, as opposed to the "more realistic" feel of the LOTR, and consequently, is a little looser with creatures. For instance, there is mention of "were-worms" of some far away desert, and goblins were separate from hobgoblins and orcs, although he lumped them into one race in LOTR. The Ent idea is an interesting one, though, but I don't think Ents were "hasty" enough to make sport out of picking off poor travelling creatures and throwing rocks about. I guess, all in all, that it's up to each individual's imagination.
---------------------------
The happiest people alive hunt for the sublime.
Ancalagon
Feb 14 2004, 07:56 PM
Tolkien originaly wrote The Hobbit (IIRC) to serve as a tester to see if his world of Middle-Earth would work or not. In it he makes several referances to Gondolin and the 'Goblin-Wars' between the Elves and the...goblins (read: Orcs) which basically was a little nod to the wars of the Elder Days between the Elves and Morgoth the original Dark Lord of whom Sauron was but a servant.
When he said Giants, IMHO he meant Giants. If you read the FotR there is mention by the Hobbits of the Shire that strange things are happening on the borders of their lands. In it they make mention of Giants and other creatures of unknown origin are increasing in number and in sightings. So simply put, IMO, there were Giants in middle-Earth yet their numbers were perhaps so small that they were rarely sited, if at all.
Muennin
Feb 15 2004, 05:38 AM
I also contend that Giants existed in Middle Earth, as an independant race. Although, I am left wondering at how their stature would measure up to that of Trolls. Instinctively, based solely on real-world history, I am lead to assume that Tolkien's Trolls would have a superior height advantage. To be honest, I'm uncertain, and will look into this further...
Morgoth
Feb 15 2004, 10:32 AM
| QUOTE (Ancalagon @ Feb 14 2004, 09:56 PM) |
Tolkien originaly wrote The Hobbit (IIRC) to serve as a tester to see if his world of Middle-Earth would work or not. In it he makes several referances to Gondolin and the 'Goblin-Wars' between the Elves and the...goblins (read: Orcs) which basically was a little nod to the wars of the Elder Days between the Elves and Morgoth the original Dark Lord of whom Sauron was but a servant.
When he said Giants, IMHO he meant Giants. If you read the FotR there is mention by the Hobbits of the Shire that strange things are happening on the borders of their lands. In it they make mention of Giants and other creatures of unknown origin are increasing in number and in sightings. So simply put, IMO, there were Giants in middle-Earth yet their numbers were perhaps so small that they were rarely sited, if at all. |
This is actually quite incorrect, Ancalagon. The Hobbit was originally never intended to be "part of Middle-earth". At the time when the Hobbit was written the existing stories about Arda ended with the War of Wrath; there was no intention to continue with stories set in the Second or Third Age (actually, there wasn't even a First Age, but only the Elder Days). The Lord of the Rings was only written since a huge number of readers called for a sequel to the Hobbit. As Tolkien put it in his letters:
| QUOTE |
| I don't much approve of The Hobbit myself, preferring my own mythology (which is just touched on) with its consistent nomenclature – Elrond, Gondo-lin, and Esgaroth have escaped out of it – and organized history, to this rabble of Eddaic-named dwarves out of Völuspá, newfangled hobbits and gollums (invented in an idle hour) and Anglo-Saxon runes. |
| QUOTE |
| I think it is plain that quite apart from it, a sequel or successor to The Hobbit is called for. I promise to give this thought and attention. But I am sure you will sympathize when I say that the construction of elaborate and consistent mythology (and two languages) rather occupies the mind, and the Silmarils are in my heart. So that goodness knows what will happen. Mr Baggins be-gan as a comic tale among conventional and inconsistent Grimm's fairy-tale dwarves, and got drawn into the edge of it – so that even Sauron the terrible peeped over the edge. |
Accordingly, the Hobbit is actually not a fully canonical writing in relation to Middle-earth, the correctness of incorrectness of certain statements has to be judged individually.
As an additional note, the only change in the story of the Hobbit that was done to let it fit better to the Lord of the Rings was the replacement of the chapter "Riddles in the Dark" which was included in a new print of the Hobbit by the publisher without consulting Tolkien if it should be included.
Jesugandalf
Feb 15 2004, 12:50 PM
| QUOTE (Ancalagon @ Feb 14 2004, 08:56 PM) |
| When he said Giants, IMHO he meant Giants. If you read the FotR there is mention by the Hobbits of the Shire that strange things are happening on the borders of their lands. In it they make mention of Giants and other creatures of unknown origin are increasing in number and in sightings. So simply put, IMO, there were Giants in middle-Earth yet their numbers were perhaps so small that they were rarely sited, if at all. |
And there is a clue, IMHO, of the existence of Entwives in the near lands of the Shire.
When Sam is speaking with Ted Sandyman, he says a relative of him (don't remember who it was) saw a tree that was moving near the borders of the Shire. Sandyman laughed at this, but, as we see after, there are trees that move. So, maybe, Sam's relative saw an Entwive.
What do you think?
Slaiv
Feb 15 2004, 04:10 PM
Interesting idea.......I believe that the Entwives rest near and/or in the Shire.....
Ancalagon
Feb 15 2004, 05:30 PM
Thanks for correcting me on that one, Morgoth. I find that interesting that Tolkien didn't '...much approve of The Hobbit...'
I had always been under the impression that he had written The Hobbit as a tester for his languages or world of Middle-Earth. It makes me happy to have been proven wrong because it means there's a whole heck of a lot more Tolkien information to find out and read in his books and letters.
Muennin
Feb 19 2004, 09:00 AM
Ancalagon, his "letters" are must reads!
Slaiv
Feb 19 2004, 07:52 PM
I'll have to find and read them.... Tolkien has always interested me, along with his way of thinking...
Daerk
Feb 20 2004, 01:19 AM
The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien
ISBN: 0395315557
-- D
Slaiv
Feb 22 2004, 04:42 PM
Thanks, Daerk. I'll pick that up soon.
Dunedain
Feb 22 2004, 11:37 PM
I think a cool twist in the game would be if the wraiths were formed during MEMod(if the timeline suits of course) and all you hear throughout the lands is news of 9 great evils risen out of the darkness...
Slaiv
Feb 23 2004, 10:15 PM
That would be nice....but we won't know until the MEMod come sout.
Daerk
Feb 24 2004, 02:40 AM
| QUOTE (Dunedain @ Feb 22 2004, 07:37 PM) |
I think a cool twist in the game would be if the wraiths were formed during MEMod(if the timeline suits of course) and all you hear throughout the lands is news of 9 great evils risen out of the darkness... |
What the hell... ?!
The wraiths are kings of men from the Second Age of Middle-Earth.

This means they have been alive for QUITE a while prior to the timeline of MEMod. There was no "forming" of the Nazgul during the Third Age.
-- D
Ancalagon
Feb 24 2004, 03:07 AM
*Looks smug
(Indicating Duneadain [sp] )
Somebody hasn't read their Tolkien

Or perhaps, Daerk, he meant that the 9 regrouped (and substituted 'formed' for lack of a better word...) as they did when they inhabitited Angmar and basically razed the Northern Kingdom to the ground (or at least helped in it's destruction, does Tolkien ever state who won the wars in the North against Angmar?)...
Hoom Hom, don't be hasty...
Jesugandalf
Feb 24 2004, 03:19 PM
We will have to set homework for people who don't do their reading...

Anyway, there are many other works by Tolkien that are also worth reading, apart from the letters. If one stops and thinks about it, any work by Tolkien is a must...
So everyone set down to read; it will be a better waiting for MEMod.
Slaiv
Feb 24 2004, 09:04 PM
That's what I was talking about. The Nazgul effectively disappeared until approximately the middle of the third age.
Pryor
Feb 26 2004, 03:07 AM
| QUOTE (the_subliminator! @ Feb 13 2004, 11:42 PM) |
I always kind of pictured the giants in The Hobbit to be cave trolls and the like. Since the book was written before the LOTR trilogy was even planned (I could be wrong about that, but it seems I'd read it somewhere), Tolkien took a little more of a high fantasy feel to the whole story, as opposed to the "more realistic" feel of the LOTR, and consequently, is a little looser with creatures. For instance, there is mention of "were-worms" of some far away desert, and goblins were separate from hobgoblins and orcs, although he lumped them into one race in LOTR. The Ent idea is an interesting one, though, but I don't think Ents were "hasty" enough to make sport out of picking off poor travelling creatures and throwing rocks about. I guess, all in all, that it's up to each individual's imagination.
---------------------------
The happiest people alive hunt for the sublime. |
I always interpreted "Were-worms" to be dragons or drakes, and Utumno being in the far, far east, it would make sense for several to be present there. Also, in the extended Fellowship of the Ring, Sam points out the three giants from The Hobbit and refers to them as "Bilbo's trolls". Ofcourse, this could just be Peter Jackson's translation, but it's interesting.
Daerk
Feb 26 2004, 08:35 AM
Actually, the "three giants" are Trolls.
-- D
Muennin
Feb 26 2004, 09:13 AM
Trolls, indeed. And, perhaps this is to blame on translation. I only bother to add this because, even in the film adaptation, Bilbo is seen to speak to the hobbit children on his most celebrated birthday and refer to said Trolls when the first daylight, "turned them all to stone."
This occurs rather early on in the same film version you speak of, Pryor. Did you link the two references?
Pryor
Feb 26 2004, 08:14 PM
| QUOTE (Muennin @ Feb 26 2004, 09:13 AM) |
Trolls, indeed. And, perhaps this is to blame on translation. I only bother to add this because, even in the film adaptation, Bilbo is seen to speak to the hobbit children on his most celebrated birthday and refer to said Trolls when the first daylight, "turned them all to stone."
This occurs rather early on in the same film version you speak of, Pryor. Did you link the two references? |
I know the scene you're talking about, but when I posted earlier, I had totally forgotten about that reference.
I had personally assumed they were Trolls after reading
Lord of the Rings and
Quenta Sil. because there was absolutely no mention of "giants". Also, if you've ever taken a look at
A Tolkien Beastiary (which has some amazing illustrations, by the way), there is no mention of "giants", either.
BTW, the quote in your signature is from Niel Peart, Rush drummer, correct?
Muennin
Feb 27 2004, 05:10 AM
OT: Yes, Pryor. Although the rhythm professor's proper first name is spelt "Neil".
Pryor
Feb 27 2004, 08:27 PM
| QUOTE (Muennin @ Feb 27 2004, 05:10 AM) |
OT: Yes, Pryor. Although the rhythm professor's proper first name is spelt "Neil". |
OT: Sue me, I was always a bigger fan of Geddy Lee.
In
The Hobbit, I remember it said, in reference to the "giants", something along the lines of, 'all giants act this way, even those with only one head.' Were there breeds of Troll with two heads?
If not, I suppose this was just a small break in continuity in them later being labeled Trolls.
Celad
Jun 14 2004, 04:14 PM
| QUOTE (Ancalagon @ Feb 24 2004, 03:07 AM) |
| does Tolkien ever state who won the wars in the North against Angmar? |
I expect that the people who were alive at the end of it were the winners.
maia
Jun 14 2004, 10:52 PM
There is mention of both Trolls and Giants in The Hobbit. The Trolls are those that turned to stone, the Giants were throwing boulders down the hills or something along those lines.
Hir_Nesta
Jun 15 2004, 07:00 AM
| QUOTE (Slaiv @ Feb 15 2004, 06:10 PM) |
| Interesting idea.......I believe that the Entwives rest near and/or in the Shire..... |
In one of the last letters in "Letters of JRRTolkien"
he mentiones that he don't believe that the Ents would ever
find their wives again.
And in a letter before he sais that they probably all got
killed in a War (don't remember which one)...
Hir_Nesta
Illuvarin
Jun 20 2004, 09:34 AM
The nazgul are the 9 humans who got a ring from Sauron which caused the war in the Second Era so in theory they would exist.
Slaiv
Jun 20 2004, 04:06 PM
Thread Necromancy'd!
Anyway, I'm pretty sure that's already been established...
Ereinion
Aug 24 2004, 08:25 PM
Tolkien wrote the Silmarillion before any of the other books, IIRC
Tor_Anders
Aug 25 2004, 12:51 AM
| QUOTE (Ereinion @ Aug 24 2004, 08:25 PM) |
| Tolkien wrote the Silmarillion before any of the other books, IIRC |
Er... Are you sure about that? Some of it maybe... But I think that Christopher Tolkien is considered the author of Silmarillion by most, as he was the one to compile and publish it 4 years after his father's death. Of course J.R.R. made the stories, and then his son rewrote/rearranged them and had them published in his father's name! Anyway, what I'm trying to say is that Silmarillion was the result of years of work, to create a background for the Middle Earth portrayed in LotR, and that The Hobbit was written first!
I really hope I'm right on this, or I'm gonna get flamed... BIGTIME...
Hir_Nesta
Aug 27 2004, 09:09 AM
nah thats right
actually the first story he wrote was Beren And Luthien and/or Earendil
but as they were published years later it's correct what you say
pharzon
Aug 27 2004, 12:12 PM
The story he wrote was The Hobbit. I'm quite sure that it was not the story of Beren and Luthien..
pharzon..
Morgoth
Aug 27 2004, 01:41 PM
The first fully formulated story was the Fall of Gondolin, if my memory doesn't trick me. Before that, the first elements of what later would become the Silmarillion were written on scraps of paper while Tolkien was spending his time lying in trenches somewhere in Northern France.
The Silmarillion underwent constant revision up to the middle of the 1930's.
Tolkien did not originally intend the Hobbit to be part of his mythology, which - up to that point - was meant to find its end in the War of Wrath. With the call for a sequel to the Hobbit, Tolkien eventually decided to incorporate these new stories in his mythology, and wrote the stories of the Second and Third Age. After the publication of the Lord of the Rings, he returned both to revising the Silmarillion (actually, he had wanted it to be published together with the Lord of the Rings, but it was rejected) and expanding on the Second and Third Age.
Unfortunately, he was never able to finish those writings, so he left only masses of texts in different phases of revision, and not one continuous story. Christopher Tolkien organized all those writings and compiled them into one book, the Silmarillion, with some editorial modifications (some of which he states to have been done wrongly in the History of Middle-earth).
pharzon
Aug 29 2004, 12:07 PM
Okay, I was wrong then.

pharzon..
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.