All rise, the court of the Almighty Hellbird is now in session! The citizen Cyronarxes stands accused of the following charges:

1) That he knowingly, willfully, committed the crime of blasphemy against the Almighty Hellbird, by insulting the moral standards of our Great Lord.

2) That he is of dangerously low moral standards, and unfit to remain in this Glorious Society.

I present the following evidence to the court:



Details of the Nanking Massacre.

Cyronarxes presents the argument that insulting people on a forum is the moral equivalent of a serious war crime. Not only that, but he argues that the mass murderers involved were merely "total assholes". It is the prosecution's view that this moral view is seriously distorted.

Naturally, the accused has already been found guilty and sentenced to death. If he was not guilty, why would he be in court? But formalities must be observed. Gentlemen of the jury, please give your verdict:

Are the moral standards of Cyronarxes correct?

I wish to take this opportunity to make the announcement that until such time that this thread is (a) locked or (b) deleted, I will be making an action of novus avatari.

I would like to thank the court for its time and now yield the floor to further debate.

IMO this fits that criteria fairly well and I really can't see it ending well. The thread's point appears to be just to embarass/pick on Cyronarxes. So, thread closed.