[Michlo]

Unless you have been brainwashed into believing that treating people equally will somehow impact you, please vote no on this proposition next month.

Thank you.

[Ethre]

To clarify (and for those who do not live in California): Proposition 8

Summary: Stop gay marriage in California.

[Michlo]

Ethre, on Oct 6 2008, 09:28 PM, said:

To clarify (and for those who do not live in California): Proposition 8

Summary: Stop gay marriage in California.

I suppose I ought to have done that, thanks. I just thought anybody in California who cared would know what it was about. heh.

Cheers.

[Skotte]

Michlo, on Oct 6 2008, 08:16 PM, said:

Unless you have been brainwashed into believing that treating people equally will somehow impact you, ...<snip>

How does it affect you that two consenting adults can get married in your state? (at least legally for now)

[myrmaad]

Skotte, on Oct 7 2008, 03:31 AM, said:

Michlo, on Oct 6 2008, 08:16 PM, said:

Unless you have been brainwashed into believing that treating people equally will somehow impact you, ...<snip>

How does it affect you that two consenting adults can get married in your state? (at least legally for now)

Duh, that's why he's voting "No".

http://en.wikipedia....sition_8_(2008)

[Elraine Kiyoshi]

I belive you misunderstood Michlo, or I misunderstood you;

To bluntly put what Michlo meant was that unless you're a discriminating rtard, vote the law down so people will still have the full freedom to do whatever they may want to do with their lives, in this case males being able to marry males and females being able to marry females. This law is directly undermining the rights of the individuals who are sexually orientated differently from the majority of the people, no matter what the conditions or orientations, they are still humans and should have equal rights to everyone else.

edit; Myrmaad made it before me, even tho she said it in a shorter way.

edit2;typo.

This post has been edited by X DLC X: 07 October 2008 - 10:38 AM

[myrmaad]

X DLC X, on Oct 7 2008, 06:15 AM, said:

I belive you misunderstood Michlo, or I misunderstood you;

To bluntly put what Michlo meant was that unless you're a discriminating rtard, vote the law down so people will still have the full freedom do whatever they may want to do with their lives, in this case males being able to marry males and females being able to marry females. This law is directly undermining the rights of the individuals who are sexually orientated differently from the majority of the people, no matter what the conditions or orientations, they are still humans and should have equal rights to everyone else.

edit; Myrmaad made it before me, even tho he said it in a shorter way.

What he said! (Myrmaad is a she btw :it's all good:)

I would like to add "and should have equal rights to everyone else" AS GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES!

[Elraine Kiyoshi]

Corrected and my humble apologies.

[forsaken_epicentre]

GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
not guaranteed, by the constitution of the United states. Do not believe that founding fathers had that idea when they wrote the Constitution. Constitution interpreted by the supreme count, which ever way they vote on or how they interpreted constitution would guaranteed or not

Gay marriage is a state to state issue an not a federal issue. That issue should not ever go to the supreme count, again it is a state to state issue. United State is Republic and should be hand as such.

[myrmaad]

forsaken_epicentre, on Oct 7 2008, 08:17 AM, said:

GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
not guaranteed, by the constitution of the United states. Do not believe that founding fathers had that idea when they wrote the Constitution. Constitution interpreted by the supreme count, which ever way they vote on or how they interpreted constitution would guaranteed or not

Gay marriage is a state to state issue an not a federal issue. That issue should not ever go to the supreme count, again it is a state to state issue. United State is Republic and should be hand as such.

You are so ridiculously inane, homosexuality has been around since the dawn of time, and I notice the founding fathers didn't bother to write any laws against it, even though it was certainly just as prevalent then as it is now. Check the actual historical record, lots of homosexuality in the 1780s, and any other time since time began.

And I'm guessing, by your definition, granting women the right to vote was a conspiracy of ACTIVIST JUDGES, as well!!!